|
Post by admin1 aka Ed on Mar 19, 2003 23:55:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Orbitron on Mar 20, 2003 21:17:23 GMT -5
SWEET!!! Drool drool.....
|
|
|
Post by Omni Existence on Mar 21, 2003 14:56:55 GMT -5
Umm...what exactly is that? Or rather, "which" exactly is that? It looks wierd??
|
|
|
Post by JoshB on Mar 21, 2003 16:28:01 GMT -5
Your photo work is improving, but your pictures are way too big for the web. Try resizing them to 640 x 480.
Josh
|
|
|
Post by Orbitron on Mar 21, 2003 17:27:58 GMT -5
I still need to get GX-13. WAAAAHH!!!
|
|
|
Post by admin1 aka Ed on Mar 23, 2003 19:39:18 GMT -5
Your photo work is improving, but your pictures are way too big for the web. Try resizing them to 640 x 480. Josh 640 by 480 eh? Hmmm.... I've always heard that 800 by 600 is best. You would know though I'll work on resizing them and/or improving the next round of photos. Thanks for the kudos ;D -E
|
|
|
Post by JoshB on Mar 23, 2003 20:45:01 GMT -5
800 x 600 is ok for wallpaper, or to print..
Your pictures weigh in around 140k, wich would take FOREVER for a dial up user. Try to keep your pictures around 60-80k for large images, and 5-10k for thumbnails. You want to make your images accessible to all users regardless of connection speed.
Also, at 600 x 800 some users will have to scroll to see all the image. a smaller image size keeps users from having to scroll.
Josh
|
|
|
Post by Edward28 on Mar 24, 2003 8:15:14 GMT -5
You are so right Josh Thanks for waking me up. I have been spoiled by cable internet lines. Now that you mention problems associted with slow connections I remember back.......it DOES suck having slow telephone lines. -And it is terrible when pictues take too long to load. Thanks for the reminder. -E
|
|