|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Aug 21, 2017 7:21:15 GMT -5
I know your goal was probably about blocking dust from getting into your display case. But that is probably a lost cause. Dust is fine and it will find it's way in. If there's gaps around the light fixture in the top, or through hinges, you'd be surprised. I think it's just best to attack the dust problem in the room directly.
I have a bedroom with open shelving (on adjustable metal brackets going up the walls) for all my robots (and garfields, I collect vintage garfield crap). It's the cheapest way to get lots of display space. 6 8-foot long shelves 16 inches deep.
Anyway, obviously there's no dust protection! And we have two cats.
In fact before I even put up a single robot I was determined to solve that issue, because I never, ever, EVER wanted to have to dust them!
I ended up deciding to go with an air purifier. It will constantly exchange all the air in the room around 6 times an hour. It also emits negatively charged ions to dislodge dust (note this is NOT the same thing as ionic breeze-type machines which emit ozone, you don't want one of those).
As with everything I buy, I researched for a couple months, looking for the best quality at the best value. (I don't want to sound like an advertisement, but PM me if you want to know my brand/models of choice). I will say though that you absolutely want a unit with a higher up front cost, but the filters only need to be replaced every 3 years. The yearly cost ends up being a fraction of those cheap consumer models that require regularly costly filter replacements. They're the inkjet printers of the air industry.
I also have a real glass display case in the dining room with some rocks and shells. And I was getting tired of dusting that (once a year before the winter solstice party).
So I just recently got another air purifier for the dining room, placed next to the display case.
If you ever look in a sunbeam shining through a room, you can see all the dust particles swirling around. After installing the air purifier, the sunbeam is dust free! And as a bonus, the air smells cleaner and the pet and food odors are gone.
And the results speak for themselves. It's been over 7 years since I setup my robot room, and I've never dusted it, and I occasionally run my finger across the bots and shelves to check and there is still no dust accumulation.
Also, regularly vacuuming with a HEPA vacuum helps. And you want a vacuum that is completely sealed, otherwise it just blows the carpet dust back into the air out cracks and gaskets in the machine. I researched that for a while too (again don't want to sound like an ad, but PM me if you want to know my choice).
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Jul 16, 2017 17:50:14 GMT -5
I forgot to mention my other issue. I thought it was a lionbot thing. He had trouble standing up straight. The upper leg into the blue/yellow lions tends to bend forward from the weight. I ended up putting little cork adhesive pads under the yellow/blue lion heads to lean him back just a bit. And as long as both upper arms remain in the down position, it stands fine. But if you try to angle an upper arm up so a sword or shield can be up more, then the weight is still too much and he tips forward.
But when I got the golion I find he has the same issue. Still in order to display standing up without risk of tipping, I had to keep the upper arms vertical and add the pads to the lion feet.
The golion is a bit stronger and will support itself still even tipped forward. The issue is that the metal from the foot hole on the back of the yellow/blue lions scrapes against the chrome on the black lion legs when he tips forward. So as a precaution I added small felt pads on the inside of the yellow/blue lions so if the black lion legs do touch, it won't be chrome against metal.
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Jul 12, 2017 21:20:52 GMT -5
Finally picked up a vintage golion to replace my lionbot. It's the version where one half of the elbow joint is chrome and the other half plastic. Must be a half-way point between the versions with all chrome elbow joints and all plastic elbow joints. Blue face and star belt.
There is no comparison at all. Superficially from a couple feet away they are mostly indistiguishable. But the moment you touch one or take a close look the differences are striking.
The lionbot has poor paint apps, bad paint edging all over. The lionbot mold tolerances are poor, gaps between metal panels, details not as sharp. The lionbot plastic is lower quality, has that sort of semi-transparent look, rounded detail, poor tolerances. The lionbot weapons are all more rounded, with missing or changed detail. And most of the missiles don't fit right into their cannons (or on the lion features). For golion, every missile works perfectly in its cannon or lion feature.
There are a couple points where the lionbot wins though. The lionbot has an absolutely beautiful gunmetal blue on the blue lion. And the green lion also has a more gunmetal-ish finish. The golion is all matt paint on the metal. Also, the lionbot chrome is shinier, but has a more dark tint to it. The golion chrome is not as shiny, and a more silver tint. The darker tint chrome I do kind of associate with cheaper toys. But it is nice and shiny. I'm guessing the less shiny chrome on golion is due to its age. Interestingly enough the chest sticker on my golion isn't centered well, so one more nod to the lionbot with a well centered sticker, though the sticker coloring itself is of lower quality. Looks more like a printed scan.
From what I can tell, original lionbots from the 80's were probably identical to the matchbox golion, extra back-door stock from the factory. Hence why some reviews say the lionbot is the same quality as matchbox. But at some point it looks like they took the CAD models and rounded edges and removed/simplified detail to allow them to be made by a lower-grade plastic and metal molding facility. This results in the modern lesser-quality lionbot. Some of the defects definitely could be mold degredation, but clear modifications/simplifications of details had to have been intentional.
Kind of reminds me of MP dairugger, the metal tolerances were definitely at a lower quality, resulting in parts not lining up quite right, or gaps or mold defects. Still a wonderful piece until Bandai finally makes an SOC.
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Mar 2, 2017 22:07:01 GMT -5
My Bandai Hi-Metal R 1/100 came today. In my opinion it's waaay better than the Yamato's. The plastic is far superior. I never once felt like I was going to break anything. The Yamato 1/60 was surprisingly sturdy despite the plastic feeling cheap and breakable. The the yamato 1/48 was total dollar-store-transforming-robot quality plastic ready to break just by looking at it. Everything on the HMR holds in place without issue in all modes. The joint tension is perfect. The transformation is way simpler and less fiddly while still creating all three modes very well and having good fit (This is in comparison too to the other bandai VF-25/27 1/72s which have overly complicated transformations, and take a bit of fiddling to get to hold together right in valkyrie mold). The fact that the landing gear is swap-pieces is not an issue. In fact it takes 1/3rd the time to swap the landing ear gon the HMR than it does to pull out the landing gear on the yamato or 1/72 bandai using toothpicks. The cockpit swap doesn't bother me, i'll just leave it in cockpit mode all the time as I totally prefer the cockpit in robot mode. The wing missiles actually clip and hold unlike the yamato 1/48 which had horrible tolerances on the missile clips. The small size is totally fine. I'm totally not on board with the every 3rd party transformer must be "masterpiece scale". There's only so much room on my shelf! FTLOG.
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Feb 24, 2017 23:28:28 GMT -5
I should also mention I modded my Jetfire's gun to fire. I opened it up and inserted a modified spring from a pen. It's definitely not child safe anymore, that thing shoots across the room!
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Feb 24, 2017 21:48:14 GMT -5
True, "jetfire" is originally a takatoku mold, and I'd read the early modern bandai lines were flops. Even for the hi-metal, it seems bandai and yamato both have V1s and V2s for everything.
I've read the complaints about the 1/100 hi-metal being non-perfect transforming because of the landing gear and cockpit. The landing gear I can live with. An understandable tradeoff for size (though my joke machine has folding landing gear!). And to be fair, the integrated landing gear on both the yamatos is a pain to open up and requires a toothpick to pry the doors open. And honestly the cockpit thing doesn't matter to me. Having grown up with jetfire, I've never had a problem with, and even prefer, the real cockpit in robot mode vs. the pirate shield.
The hi-metal definitely has it's flaws for it's own loose parts and finicky parts. I'm just impressed with the materials, finish, and color.
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Feb 24, 2017 12:10:42 GMT -5
I've been through the whole history! Actually I read through everything before deciding which toys to buy, hence why the Yamato 1/60 ended up being the first modern one I bought. And my expectations were understandably high for the Yamato's given the reviews.
I'd read through every single article on anymoon/Scorched Earth, Collection DX, Macross World, etc. Learned the history of how the 1/55 Valkyrie was the first perfect transforming toy. And Being a diaclone/machine robo fan I've gone through the history of all the toys that are not actually takara/bandai that were added to the US lines (and where all the Converters/Mark/Select toys came from). And of course the whole takatoku/popy/bandai history.
Needless to say this is purely my opinion. I have friends who completely agree with my on the toy assessment, but are completely in the line-art-accuracy and/or Macross fan camp and still hold the yamato/arcadia as the best.
My perspective is entirely toy perspective. What does it feel like in your hands. And I just love that chunky 80's robot aesthetic. I like perfect vehicle modes and robots that look like they were made from vehicles, vs. perfect robot modes and trainwreck alt-modes.
I like the shiny chrome, heavy metal, tons of little accessories, hidden gimmicks, firing missiles, chromy stickers, tinted plastic canopies, etc off the original 80's Chogokin often more than the SOC poseability and perfection.
I like the diecast puzzles of bandai's machine robo/gobots over many of the fandom preferred Transformers.
And I do enjoy a good posing robot too. I have 6 Super Robot Chogokins. I like posing them, and I like them because they are small! For one, the details stand out more, and two, I can fit all 6 on a small shelf. And I like posing 3rd party transformers as well (And those 3rd parties do a much better job than anything Takara has put out since the original Henkei/Generations line).
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Feb 24, 2017 7:59:31 GMT -5
I grew up with Jetfire. I remember receiving him new as a present when we were moving in 1985. I watched Robotech along with Voltron growing up. Though I honestly can't say I specifically remember associating Jetfire with Robotech as a kid. So I put myself in a unique position in Valkyrie lovers. I love the Valkyrie, not the Macross. I like heavy metal jets that transform into heavy metal robots. And I love armor and weapons. Having grown up with Jetfire instead of Macross, I give little regard to Gerwalk mode. It's a fun little aside. A half way point between the jet and robot modes I care about. I enjoy creating gerwalk modes out of robots that aren't supposed to have them. And in sharing my views of transformers and machine robo, it's all about the toys, not the cartoons. The consensus across the internet is clear, Yamato 1/60 is the defacto greatest Valkyrie even until today. Yamato is the gold standard, though their V1's tended to have 3rd party level QC issues. My opinion couldn't be more opposite. Sure the Yamato 1/60 probably has the most accurate to line-art proportions in all three modes, best gerwalk mode, blah blah blah. But the plastic is dull and matte and looks cheap. Transforming it feels like the plastic will break off in your hands, and it feels light and lacks mass. In the Voltron scale of Toynami to Bandai, Yamato definitely feels like it's on the Toynami side of look and feel. I also find them to be completely boring without the fastpack. i don't know why they even sell valkyries without a fast pack. The fast pack is what makes a valkyrie a valkyrie (or a jetfire a jetfire). The Yamato 1/48 is definitely the Toynami Masterpiece of valkyries. The plastic feels like dollar store bootleg transformers. Two panels on the legs inexplicably cracked during transformation, and the rest of the plastic feels three times cheaper than the 1/60. Stuf is loose, and the missile attachment points suck and can barely hold missiles on. The nosecone and tips of the jet pack are constantly popping off. In stark contrast, the Bandai valkyries are engineering marvels and aesthetic pieces of art. The modern Bandai hi-metal uses the same heavy plastic that feels like aircraft grade steel from the SOC line. It shines and glows and the color apps are impeccable. It's heavy and beautiful. The Yamato feels like Revoltech in comparison. The only downside is the metal ball joints for arms and legs. Mine are impossible to stand by themselves with the heavy backpack of wings, and the arms don't want to stay up holding the gun out. But they all come with a high quality display stand which I use to make them stand up. All and all, out of all the valkyries spanning 30 years, there is no contest. The original 1980's Jetfire is still the king. It still looks the be best in jet mode and robot mode (and I mean "best', not "show or line-art accurate"). The proportions are impeccable, especially in robot mode. None of the more accurate ones get that hulky chest and body done right like Jetfire. They all end up with tiny little bodies with silly long legs. And playability. The clickety ratched joints and straightforward transformation on the Jetfire mold is top notch. You can actually play with it. You can swoosh it around the room and have battles. The far more poseable modern valkyries lack clickety hip and arm ratchets, and feel parts will pop off if you swoosh them too much. They are display pieces, not toys. Even the 1980's SDF-1 just feels right with all the clickety-ness and quality sticker applications, and quality plastic and metal. Even though it's capable of about two total poses. I just ordered a Bandai Hi-Metal R VF-1 so I'll see what that looks like compared to the Yamato. In order left to right, 1/55 Gakken Mospeada ALpha Legioss 1/48 Yamato Maximilian 1/55 Bandai Jetfire 1/3000 Bandai SDF-1 Bandai Joke Machine 1/60 Yamato GBP 1/72 RVF-25 Bandai Messia Luca Custom 1/72 Bandai Ghost 1/72 RVF-27 Bandai Lucifer
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Feb 12, 2017 11:17:29 GMT -5
I came across this oddity: www.ebay.com/itm/161064951144It looks like a gashapon. It's a miniature combining voltron. It's labeled EIMC/Empire (empire international merchandising corporation). I found some reports on macross forums of small transforming valkyries from EIMC being shipped as promo toys in cereal boxes. So I'm wondering if this might be from some asian cereal box promo or something. Seems a bit too big to actually be a gashapon. I'm curious if it's actually rare enough to warrant 1000 Hamiltons. If I knew what it was called or from I could probably find one much cheaper!
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Feb 12, 2017 11:03:45 GMT -5
In the individual lion displays, from left to right, GX-71 Soul Of Chogokin Toynami 30th Anniversary Mad Toys King Of Beast 84 Golion (modern Taiwan bootleg) 84 LJN Motorized Lion Force In the combined display, from left to right, 84 LJN Motorized Lion Force Mad Toys King Of Beast Toynami 30th Anniversary GX-71 Soul Of Chogokin 84 Golion (modern Taiwan bootleg) Japanese Golion ST There's tons of reviews on these already so I won't bore you, but here's my one-sentence personal take on the various voltrons: GX-71 Soul Of Chogokin This is the simply the greatest piece of toy engineering I have ever seen. The plastic is like samurai sword steel-grade. The design, weight, color, materials, sheen, is impeccable. The only flaw is the green/red tails don't lift up higher, as they get in the way of a proper "sitting" pose. Toynami 30th Anniversary As long as you never ever touch it, it actually has the best looking brightest colors and shiny chrome of all the versions. But it's a floppy mess. It can't hold it's sword out in front of it's body with out leaning forward. The blue lion can't even stand without the front legs collapsing. The black lion can't even keep it's own head raised. And those tiny wings and strange skinny legs bother me. The glowing eyes are awesome, but why can't there be a freaking off switch? I have to insert that plastic tab to prevent burning out the batteries while on display, which prevents his face from coming all the way down. I love the key activation stand, but why didn't they have it say the 'mega thrusters are go" line? Mad Toys King Of Beast I love this. Despite most reviews saying the SOC vs KOB is an "either or", I think they are not mutually exclusive. SOC/Toynami etc is an anime/toy accurate voltron. KOB is an modern robot, industrial cyberpunk, ready-for-war, mecha version. The more military shades of colors, robotic mech legs, and greebled body surfaces, and alternate wing shape, clear red shoulder pieces, make it it's own valid toy in its own right. The weight, materials, design, fit, sturdiness, design are almost comparable to Bandai. The biggest flaw is the leg ratchets only allow a straight-up or wide-pose, I wish there was an in-between A-pose. And that the heads could lower more. Also, while you'd never care on its own, stood next to the others it looks a little dull and bland due to the lack of chrome and stickers/fewer paint apps, military colors. But I think some reprolabels could fix that. Also, the front legs on the red and green lions in combined mode seem a little too pronounced at first, but do grow on you. I actually prefer the original KOB to the new licensed version, as I embrace the non-accurate differences as making it worth adding to my shelf along with the others. 84 Golion (modern Taiwan bootleg) I believe it was a thread on this board that told me the Taiwan bootleg was supposed to be nearly the same quality as the original. It is not. From the moment you touch it you can tell the plastic and fit and metal mold tolerances is BL quality. I mainly just wanted to get all the extra weapons and firing body parts, but most of them can't hold or fire their own missiles due to QC/tolerances. But now that the MT KOB and Bandai SOC have all the weapons, it's not so important to me anymore. I'm considering just finding an original matchbox. My childhood memories just tell me voltron felt better than this. It's kind of like getting a TF commemorative re-issue. Despite it being the same mold, you can just feel the cheaper quality plastic and degraded mold tolerances that have hit it. The vintage cannot be replaced with a re-issue. Note that The SOC red lion's head pulls out 1/4 inch to give it a neck. I didn't realize this until later, so the individual lion picks show it with a short neck. I couldn't figure out how to attach images so I had to hotlink to my FB.
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Apr 14, 2016 6:15:30 GMT -5
I'm looking for a complete Machine Robo Sidelanser (or SideRanser if you go by the box lol) www.collectiondx.com/toy_review/1986/machine_robo_sidelanserWill pay a fair market price depending on condition and completeness. I'm also looking for the other two Japanese combiners, DoubleJet and DrillHeli, though my desired price on these would be less than Sidelanser. Though I wouldn't shoot down the opportunity to get all three. I'd also be interested in the remaining Change & Glow and Winner robo (auto-transforming slot cars), ProTruck Racer, and Triple-Jim. I have the C&G train and ambulance, and a poor condition black F1 Winner. My desired price on these is typically a third of the e-bay BIN auctions that show up. Like 15-30$ each, maybe more for a good condition cool one. counter-x.net/gobots/reviews/cg/index.htmlcounter-x.net/gobots/reviews/mrwr/index.htmlcounter-x.net/gobots/reviews/roc/triple_jim.htmltoyboxdx.com/phorum/read.php?4,217240,217503 I would like a better condition Highway robo, with all the pre-applied stickers and clean chrome counter-x.net/gobots/reviews/mr/highway_robo.htmlFinally, I need the following Rock Lord weapons (just the weapons) Spearhead, Sunstone www.toyarchive.com/Rocklords/RocklordsSpearheadMOSC1a.jpgwww.toyarchive.com/JewellordsSunstoneLoose1a.jpgWill pay a fair market price (~20 each) Somewhat unrelated, I'm missing a small chrome gun for the Maskman DX (attached to the upper-left vehicle in this picture) www.flickr.com/photos/48146844@N04/4413208788/in/photostream/I'd pay around 50. This thread is mainly for the sidelanser which I will pay the fair price on. Some of the stuff I want I just haven't been willing to pay near the e-bay prices. But if you want your machine robo to go to a good home, I'm a huge machine robo advocate. I have the whole 600 series, supers, rocklords, I even have the Arjettan, Snarlie Narlie, and 747 robo. I think they are hugely underappreciated. Far more complex than similarly sized Transformers (Which I also collect, I don't see why you have to chose sides here!)
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Apr 13, 2016 5:37:43 GMT -5
is it ok to post "Wanted"?
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Nov 20, 2015 20:56:49 GMT -5
I recently finally got my complete joke machine valkyrie, the japanese version with unapplied stickers. I've not much experience in modern model kits, and my bandai macross didn't have any stickers. The sticker sheet that came with this doesn't have pre-cut stickers on it. Before I proceed and accidentally destroy them or my toy, I was wondering if someone could tell me if they are 1. regular stickers, I Just need to cut them out to shape myself 2. dry-transfer stickers 3. water-transfer stickers Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Jan 14, 2015 8:52:19 GMT -5
What' is Buddy's website?
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Jan 14, 2015 0:20:27 GMT -5
So what happened here? I don't know how this came out of nowhere but i just discovered it today. I don't see how something this big and awesome could not have had a years worth of hype build-up behind it. This is like the Bandai SOC Golion we've all been dreaming of.
But it seems every website that sold this product is now shut down. What happened? Is this a 3rd party or do they have some asian license ala MP?
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Jan 4, 2015 21:42:09 GMT -5
Wow, a year and a half after I got mine from Toyfreakz and this is still going on. I actually read every single of the first 350 or so posts. But I mostly bowed out after mine came. Back when I got mine (oct 2013, see my last post here robotjapan.proboards.com/thread/19216/miracle-productions-diecast-vehicle-voltron?page=307)the assumption was the toyfreakz versions was supposed to be the 3rd version. But I'm still reading in the last couple of pages about 3rd vs. 2nd and all that. Did we ever verify whether the toyfreakz version was the 3rd version or not? I still think VV is a great toy and I'm glad we got it. It could be years if ever we get something similar from Bandai. It definitely feels like a 3rd party, but I buy tons of 3rd party transformers, for higher prices than takara-tomy, so I know what I'm getting in to. It's kind of similar quality to b-grade 3rd parties (x-transbots, impossible toys) only metal instead of plastic. I am surprised the price hasn't shot up yet. For how unique and pretty good (80/100 for a 2nd or 3rd version) and great for posing, and limited run, I'm surprised it's not up to 500$ on e-bay now. Of course being I could get it for 230 off e-bay now makes me wish I didn't pay the 285, but whatever. 285 is actually a completely fair price, quality included, given I paid 399 for maketoys utopia.
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Dec 3, 2013 0:10:11 GMT -5
I sent toyfreakz an e-mail on the 22nd to the addresses on the website (one address is hidden, you have to select the emptyness to see it).
On the 24th I got an "order complete" mail.
And woot! VV showed up today (2nd).
I did a detailed over on every part (didn't put it together yet). It really expounds quality. The double boxing, the thick cardboard foldtop box, plastic parts tray, cold heavy pieces, transparent plastic cockpits, and awesome gunmetal paint apps. That gunmetal paint really makes it. And the rubber treads on the subs! Feels like a brother to my voltes.
Some downsides, they could have printed the instructions on thicker glossy paper. The hilts of all three swords have the same sort of bend in them. but not enough for me to really care. The molding quality is definitely of lower tolerances. You can tell there's a lot of like 10-20-mil imperfections in all the part edges and seams. But because everything is such a large scale, none of the mold tolerances really affect the toy or transformations. Now if the toy was 1/4 the size then it might matter.
There's some paint line overruns and such if you scrutinize everything, but in reality, it's still 10 times better than hasbro transformers. I usually go through 5 of the same Generations figure on the rack until I find one without hideous paint flaws.
There's a few flashing issues, one on the red plane makes the wing stick out a bit. I don't know if I want to try to shave that one down though. And a few of the cockpits don't sit all the way in due to plastic flashings. I might shave those off. But you don't really notice unless you hold it just right and can see through the seams.
The right (from VV pov) face door is really tight to get all the way open, I was scared I was going to break it, and the two halves don't hold flush together. But I don't think the 1980's one did either. The face paint seems perfect. And I got a transparent blue cockpit on the head, which is what I would have wanted the most anyway.
You really can't tell from pictures but once you hold each vehicle in your hand and see it in person, it really looks and feels high quality, and the best way to describe it is that it IS exactly the diecast metal version of vehicle voltron we've all wanted since the 80's. It's a bit chunky, which I think just makes that statement all the more true, like the original 80's jetfire and matchbox lion voltron. Fragile yes, but heavy and chunky and can take a little play-time.
That said, I think about 175 would have been a great price for it. 225 I could see if there was less risk of QC issues. I do think 270 was a bit much, but having said that, obviously I paid that, as did many of us, so clearly 270 was the right price after all. I could honestly see paying 350 for it at a convention if I saw it in person and didn't know the backstory.
My question for everyone else who has theirs, since I didn't notice any QC issues off the bat, what kind of less obvious issues should I look for? Certain transformation bits, or out of the way hinges, or anything that seems to be common?
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Nov 22, 2013 22:11:05 GMT -5
Are people still getting theirs shipped to them? Seems like it's been quite a while now, and mine's still "processing", just like lunch at Arby's.
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Nov 14, 2013 20:50:31 GMT -5
4 Heads is BETTER than one!! Versions 2.0 and Final...waist differences 2.o is metal,Final is plastic.Final has sharper detail in plastic.If anyone needs to "GET A-HEAD"..let me know got 2 extras.One is a special frosted version? Wait, what is the difference between Version 2.0 and "Final" ?? I thought TF and luxuray malls and what no are all the "2.0" version? And I thought I was going to get mine like 3 weeks ago. And still no updates... I'm starting to consider the luxury malls one. Save myself 50 bucks. But I figure if I try to cancel it'll just get shipped immediately anyway so I won't get my money back. Though I could solve problem A with that at least...
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterthrash on Nov 4, 2013 0:40:27 GMT -5
Minneapolis. Haven't received a single e-mail since the order confirmation in June. I'm hoping it ships this week. And no QC issues. And it arrives. Undamaged.
|
|